Just 'Close Your Eyes'
- JSPAN Freedom Seder Supplement Available on the Web
- Pennsylvania and the Death Penalty
- Tom Corbett, Pennsylvania Governor, On Ultrasound Mandate: Just 'Close Your Eyes'
- Admin. Outlines Options on Birth Control Coverage
- Living With the Church-State Tension
- Disparities Threaten a Nation of Minorities
- Young Americans Less Interested in the Environment than Previous Generations
- Politics vs. Policy: Violence Against Women Act Dustup in Senate
- Book Review: Cosmic Constitutional Theory
|JSPAN Freedom Seder Supplement Available on the Web|
JSPAN announces that its 2012 Passover Supplement to the Haggadah is now available. The Freedom Seder Supplement celebrates emerging freedom movements around the
world with poems, texts and prayers. Editors Stephen C. Sussman Esq. and Kenneth R. Myers Esq. have drawn from far-ranging sources, from Lord Byron to Tibet. Each
of the readings includes suggestions keying it into the traditional Seder service.
Supplements to the traditional Haggadah relate the biblical story of the Exodus to current events and issues. In 2010 JSPAN released its first Supplement, entitled "We were strangers," on the theme of immigration in history and in the United States. In 2011 the JSPAN Supplement, "This is the bread of poverty," brought the focus to hunger here and around the world. The 2012 "Freedom Seder" takes up the human longing for freedom that is spreading around the globe, and concludes with four resolutions that we as American Jews can meaningfully adopt.
The 2012 Freedom Supplement, comprised of 16 pages with illustrations, is available without charge as a download from the JSPAN web site.
|Pennsylvania and the Death Penalty|
New York Times Editorial (March 18, 2012)|
In the past year, the appalling injustice of Pennsylvania's death penalty system has been the subject of review and debate among the state judiciary, lawyers and the media. Two new judicial reports and a recent death sentence for an indigent defendant in Philadelphia further bolster the case to abolish the system.
In February, a report by a Philadelphia judge ordered by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court found that the amount the city has long paid court-appointed private lawyers in death cases is "grossly inadequate" and has increased "the risk of ineffective counsel." A RAND study in December similarly found that low pay and lack of support for court-appointed lawyers in Philadelphia were significant factors in inadequate legal representation. The consequences have played out in legal appeals: of the state's capital convictions since 1976, 32 percent were reversed or sent back for new hearings because of errors by lawyers, according to an investigation by The Philadelphia Inquirer last October.
|Tom Corbett, Pennsylvania Governor, On Ultrasound Mandate: Just 'Close Your Eyes'|
Huffington Post (03/15/2012)|
During a discussion of a far-reaching mandatory ultrasound bill, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett (R) on Wednesday dismissed off-handedly the insinuation that the measure goes too far, saying, "You just have to close your eyes."
Corbett reaffirmed his support for the "Women's Right to Know" Act, which would require doctors to perform an ultrasound on a patient, offer her two personalized copies of the image and play and describe fetal heartbeat in detail before she can have an abortion -- "as long as it's not obtrusive."
He did not indicate whether or not he considered a transvaginal ultrasound to be an intrusive procedure, which the bill would require doctors to perform on a woman whose fetus is not developed enough to be visible by a regular, "jelly-on-the-belly" ultrasound.
Asked if he thinks the bill goes too far to make a woman look at the ultrasound image, Corbett responded, "You can't make anybody watch, okay? Because you just have to close your eyes. As long as it's on the exterior and not the interior."
|Admin. Outlines Options on Birth Control Coverage|
The Associated Press (March 16, 2012)|
WASHINGTON - The Obama administration signaled Friday it's willing to help insurance companies offset the cost of providing free birth control to women working at church-affiliated institutions like hospitals and colleges.
By finding a way to make the middlemen whole, the administration may be able to extricate itself from an unexpected political furor over birth control that has mobilized partisans across the political spectrum a half-century after the advent of the pill.
A 32-page regulatory proposal unveiled Friday offered options for providing free birth control to women whose employers object to contraception on religious grounds. The government now classifies birth control as preventive care, and President Barack Obama's health care law requires health plans to cover prevention at no cost to the consumer.
Churches, synagogues, mosques and other institutions whose primary purpose is to propagate faith are exempt from the mandate. But when the administration sought to impose the requirement on religious nonprofits serving the public, it triggered a backlash. That forced President Barack Obama himself to offer a compromise: insurers, not the religious employers would bear the responsibility.
|Living With the Church-State Tension|
Democracies Respect Religious Freedom, With Clear Lines|
By Perry Dane, The Forward (March 23, 2012)
Few topics are as fraught and complicated, or as tempting to oversimplify, as the encounter between religion and state. Take Israel. The balance of religion and state seems to be particularly imperiled for a variety of cultural and political reasons. Some Israelis think the problem has to do with an increase in religious commitment itself. They point, for example, to a recently released Guttman Center survey that found that only 44% of those questioned believed that "in the event of a contradiction between halacha and democratic principles, democracy should always take precedence." In fact, Ben-Gurion University professor Harvey Hames argued in these pages a few weeks ago that this finding "implies that when push comes to shove, a majority of Israelis would prefer Jewish law to democratic values." But this overlooks some crucial particulars.
First, though the survey did report that only 44% of respondents would always give priority to "democratic values," it also found that a mere 20% would always give priority to Halacha. The remaining 36% answered quite sensibly, given the vacuity of the question, that "each case must be judged on its own merits." Second, any religiously serious person is likely to believe that "when push comes to shove," a divine imperative prevails over a human command, whether the source of that command is a dictator or a democracy. For that matter, any serious nonreligious person is likely to have some commitment that would take priority over unconscionable majority decisions. Third, modern democratic tradition itself embraces the idea that even democracy has its limits, particularly with respect to religion. James Madison - drafter of the American Bill of Rights, and not a Haredi Jew - eloquently insisted, "It is the duty of every man to render to the Creator such homage and such only as he believes to be acceptable to him. This duty is precedent, both in order of time and in degree of obligation, to the claims of Civil Society. Before any man can be considered as a member of Civil Society, he must be considered as a subject of the Governour of the Universe."
The challenge is not deciding who should prevail "when push comes to shove"; it is trying to keep push from coming to shove. For democratic constitutions, that means respecting as much religious liberty as possible, while also drawing clear jurisdictional lines between religion and government to try to protect each side from the encroachments of the other. For religious traditions, it means developing an understanding of legitimate state authority and a respect for pluralism and the conscience of others. The Halacha, in all its richness, already has most of the tools necessary to reconcile itself, most of the time, to democratic governance.
Perry Dane is a professor of law at the Rutgers School of Law - Camden and a member of JSPAN's Church-State Policy Center
|Disparities Threaten a Nation of Minorities|
Philly.com (March 12, 2012)|
By Lewis Diuguid,
Because of this country's racist past, the future for people of color, and for the United States overall, doesn't look too promising. That was the conclusion of a report by the group United for a Fair Economy.
Consider that in 1980, the U.S. population was 80 percent white. By 2010, the white portion had dropped to 65 percent. The Census Bureau now projects that by 2042, eight years sooner than once predicted, the United States will become a majority-minority nation.
The challenge is that America's history of discrimination has created an enduring legacy of economic oppression for people of color. There simply won't be a broad enough base of high-wage, taxpaying young people of color to maintain the United States as a superpower.
The continuing racial disparity will be too great to ignore, the report warns.
|Young Americans Less Interested in the Environment than Previous Generations|
Washington Post (March 15, 2012) |
By Martha Irvine
CHICAGO - They have a reputation for being environmentally minded do-gooders. But an academic analysis of surveys spanning more than 40 years has found that today's young Americans are less interested in the environment and in conserving resources - and often less civic-minded overall - than their elders were when they were young. The findings go against the widespread belief that environmental issues have hit home with today's young adults, known as Millennials, who have grown up amid climate change discussion and the mantra "reduce, reuse, recycle." The environment is often listed among top concerns of young voters.
"I was shocked," said Jean Twenge, a psychology professor at San Diego State University who is one of the study's authors. "We have the perception that we're getting through to people. But at least compared to previous eras, we're not."
This study, published online this month in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, looked at the life goals, concern for others and civic orientation of three young generations - baby boomers, Generation X and Millennials.
|Politics vs. Policy: Violence Against Women Act Dustup in Senate|
ABC News (March 16, 2012)|
By SUNLEN MILLER
Republican aides emphasize that their bosses are not against the Violence Against Women Act, originally passed in 1994 and reauthorized at least twice by Congress. But the new version of the bill, they say, is a "drastic expansion" of parts of the law as it was negotiated by the Senate Judiciary Committee this year.
The disagreement has forced Republican senators into a political corner on an issue in which they believe they're right about the policy. But their opposition to the tweaks and updates to the bill is what has garnered much attention, especially in the context of what's been called a war on women. A Republican aide said the Democratic changes to the bill, "deliberately contain unserious legal provisions on issues such as immigration designed to create the false appearance of obstruction." Six Democratic female senators took to the floor Thursday to push for the domestic violence bill, a coordinated effort to gain momentum and shine the spotlight on the reauthorization that's still pending.
|Book Review: Cosmic Constitutional Theory|
Why Americans Are Losing Their Inalienable Right to Self-Governance
By J. Harvie Wilkinson III
New York Times Book Review (March 16, 2012)
In courts and law schools across America, the most intense legal battles are fought over theories of constitutional interpretation. From the originalists on the right to the living constitutionalists on the left, each of the warring camps claims that it has discovered the true faith and accuses its opponents of hypocrisy. Now comes Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III with a bracingly clear and bipartisan message: All the theories are bunk! According to Wilkinson's "Cosmic Constitutional Theory," "the theories have given rise to nothing less than competing schools of liberal and conservative judicial activism, schools that have little in common other than a desire to seek theoretical cover for prescribed and often partisan results." As a result of their cosmic theorizing, Wilkinson concludes, liberal and conservative judges and justices are too quick to second-guess the choices of legislatures, and the casualty is "our inalienable right of self-governance."
Wilkinson, who was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit by Ronald Reagan, is one of the most respected appellate judges in the country; he was on President George W. Bush's shortlist for the Supreme Court. It's not surprising that he indicts liberal justices like William Brennan for embracing a theory of living constitutionalism that "led the courts deep into the thickets of abortion, capital punishment and habeas corpus" by encouraging them to update the Constitution in light of contemporary values. While praising the living constitutionalists for "giving the elected branches leeway to craft fruitfully modern definitions of terms like 'equality' and 'commerce,'" Wilkinson sharply criticizes Roe v. Wade, which he says "flunked simultaneously the three most basic interpretive tests" - it was unsupported by constitutional text, history or structure.
More surprisingly, however, Wilkinson is just as critical of the jurisprudence of original understanding, embraced by Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. Calling originalism a form of "activism masquerading as restraint," he says that the methodology "fails to constrain judicial choices" when the historical evidence is ambiguous, which it is in every hard case.
|Your Opinion Counts|
The editors of the JSPAN newsletter welcome reader's comments regarding the content and format of the newsletter. We want to know what you like and dislike. Are we
providing a perspective and service that you find informative and worth reading? Do you have comments on specific articles or items? Let us know what you think!
Send all comments to email@example.com
Remember that JSPAN welcomes your donations to help us continue our important and effective work in Tikkun Olam. You may send gifts via PayPal on www.jspan.org. or to JSPAN, 1735 Market Street, Suite #A417, Philadelphia, PA 19103
To become a JSPAN member, please go to www.JSPAN.org. On the right side of your screen you will be able to start a secure transaction and become a member.
Make all checks payable to:
1735 Market Street, Suite #A417
Philadelphia, PA 19103
First Vice President
Secretary & General Counsel
Policy Centers Chair
Chair of the Board of Directors
David S. Broida
Hon. Ruth Damsker
Rabbi Elliot Holin
Rabbi Robert Layman
Richard I. Malkin
Audrey Ann Ross
J. Sanford Schwartz
Rabbi David Straus
Rabbi Joshua Waxman
Alex Urevick Ackelsberg
Jill Katz Zipin
The newsletter contains articles and links to articles that we think will be of interest to
JSPAN members. They are included for informational purposes, but unless
otherwise stated, they do not necessarily reflect official JSPAN policy.
As an organization for change, JSPAN strives to advance progressive social policies on the critical issues of our time. Help spread the news about us by forwarding this email and the link to our website http://www.jspan.org to your family, friends, and colleagues who might have an interest in joining JSPAN or serving on any of JSPAN's projects. If you haven't joined JSPAN, please join now!
Click to view this email in a browser
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, please reply to this message with "Unsubscribe" in the subject line or simply click on the following link: Unsubscribe
Jewish Social Policy Action Network
1735 Market Street, Suite #A417
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Read the VerticalResponse marketing policy.